ron22
255 posts
msg #144820
- Ignore ron22 |
10/1/2018 10:06:02 AM
@nibor100, Thank you very much for your informative and timely post. I will read the Guppy blog post today. Good Trading. Ron
|
graftonian
1,089 posts
msg #144821
- Ignore graftonian
modified |
10/1/2018 12:24:26 PM
TLRY is almost there, imho.
ps: using GMMAs, volume, MACD, 30day Hull MA, and schaff trend cycle
|
ron22
255 posts
msg #144826
- Ignore ron22 |
10/1/2018 4:10:01 PM
I highly recommend the Guppy Template blog on EdgeRater. The link is in Nibor100's post of 10/1. Ron
|
ron22
255 posts
msg #144827
- Ignore ron22 |
10/1/2018 5:01:12 PM
Long Guppy Filter for IRA
Submit
I think that the above filter will ensure that Traders Group is above Investors Group and that both Traders and Investors are Aligned. I would greatly appreciate it if someone could tweak the filter so that : there is a minimum of 0.2% separation between the Investors Group and the Traders Group. Thank you. Ron
|
compound_gains
222 posts
msg #144828
- Ignore compound_gains |
10/1/2018 9:09:43 PM
|
ron22
255 posts
msg #144829
- Ignore ron22 |
10/1/2018 10:02:09 PM
@compound_gains, that is exactly what I wanted. Thanks a lot. Ron
|
nibor100
1,046 posts
msg #144836
- Ignore nibor100 |
10/2/2018 11:36:49 AM
@ron22,
1. Looks like there may be a typo in the Compound_Gains filter for ema(15)
2. Here's a trial short filter version of the Guppy MMA's, all aligned, and sorted by those with least separation (short term group is just coming thru long term group, with both groups aligned).
Just click on the diff% column to reverse the sort and see the stocks having the greatest separation between the 2 aligned groups. (alignment in this case means the EMAs are stacked from shortest to longest in descending numerical order)
Ed S.
|
ron22
255 posts
msg #144843
- Ignore ron22 |
10/2/2018 5:45:00 PM
@nibor100, Good filter Ed. Thanks Ron
|
nibor100
1,046 posts
msg #144866
- Ignore nibor100 |
10/5/2018 1:48:20 PM
Guppy Investigation, Case #2,
I like looking for crosses of the longest short term avg EMA(15) crossing above the shortest long term avg EMA(30) in the traditional Guppy MMA groupings as indications of new upward separations of the 2 groups..
Mactheriverrat adds a longer term short term avg EMA(17) to some of his Guppy MMA charts and touts the longest short term avg EMA(17) crossing above the shortest long term avg EMA(50) as verification of new upward separations of the 2 groups.
I wonder if
a. is one more reliable than the other?
b. if either or both are triggering too late on some stocks for best possible long trade entries?
c. Is some other pair of averages from the 2 groups better?
d. If 1 short term avg crossing above 1 long term avg is a reliable indicator of upward group separation for long trade entries; do we even need all of the other averages to be on our charts? Or are they just a visual confidence booster?
Ed S.
|
nibor100
1,046 posts
msg #149620
- Ignore nibor100 |
11/17/2019 11:27:46 AM
@Mactheriverrat,
So I get in my truck, outside Buffalo Wild Wings this past Thursday night, after having some beers with my softball team, and turn on my radio which was still on the CNBC station from earlier in the day, and lo and behold they are doing some kind of chart review segment with Darryl Guppy!
No mention of his Guppy MMAs while I was listening, however. Then I switched over to Classic Rock.
He still has a pretty thick accent.
Ed S.
|