roca1018 163 posts msg #149901 - Ignore roca1018 |
12/17/2019 7:19:35 AM
Ed,
Is there a way to modify this filter so that people with a basic subscription can run it?
Thanks
Rich
|
nibor100 1,044 posts msg #149903 - Ignore nibor100 |
12/17/2019 11:31:22 AM
@roca1018,
I'm not certain which filter you are referring to, can you please clarify?
Thanks,
Ed S.
|
roca1018 163 posts msg #149927 - Ignore roca1018 |
12/19/2019 6:58:59 AM
Thanks Ed. You posted the filter on this thread on 12/4/19. It requires a higher subscription.
Rich
|
nibor100 1,044 posts msg #149931 - Ignore nibor100 |
12/19/2019 1:08:49 PM
@roca1018,
Try the version below with a modification that Cheese implemented:
Thanks,
Ed S.
|
roca1018 163 posts msg #149983 - Ignore roca1018 |
12/23/2019 5:41:11 AM
Ed,
There are 306 stocks listed for the close on 12/20/19. Is it best to choose stocks based on their historical
winning % ?
Thanks
Rich
|
nibor100 1,044 posts msg #150015 - Ignore nibor100 |
12/25/2019 10:35:24 AM
@Rich,
1. I have not tested whether or not it is best to choose stocks based on their historical winning % for this filter's results so I can't really answer your question.
2. Please remember that this filter is the first in a series of Weinstein exploratory filters I'm planning on trying out, when I get around to it. This filter is only testing the 30 week/150 day moving avg crossover and none of the other Weinstein key criteria.
3. Also, the Xarlor filter I started with has some criteria which may or may not be applicable to pure Weinstein theory.such as the section on general assumptions about price and volume.
Thanks,
Ed S.
|
sandjco 648 posts msg #150016 - Ignore sandjco |
12/25/2019 10:48:06 AM
Not sure if this applies..
Adding this line
my eye test on sorting wr%...100% wr wasn't conclusive i.e. a 100% wr ended having higher gains vs lower wr.
|
roca1018 163 posts msg #150022 - Ignore roca1018 |
12/26/2019 6:41:44 AM
Thanks Ed
|