| StockFetcher Forums · View by Author: (390 messages) [ Display By: Date / Subject ] | << 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 >> |
 | |
| Stock Picks and Trading · Weinstein Strategy Picks | |
| xarlor msg #148420 |
7/7/2019 7:53:58 PM @ron22 Ah, good catch! I modified it to just take into account recent volume increases: |
| Stock Picks and Trading · Weinstein Strategy Picks | |
| xarlor msg #148415 modified |
7/7/2019 12:52:49 PM WYNN popped up on my Stage 2 Weinstein filter on 07/01/19. Ticks all the boxes: Broke resistance Broke above WMA(150) Positive relative strength and sloping up Sector is bullish  Other tickers to consider with the same set up: LVS SWKS |
| General Discussion · Stan Weinstein's Secrets For Profiting in Bull and Bear Markets | |
| xarlor msg #148373 modified |
7/4/2019 12:33:22 PM "talked about how this ratio can be negative or positive. This can't be negative the way he defined it. What am I missing?" I presume he means anything above 1.0 is positive (outperforming the comparing index) and below 1.0 is negative (underperforming the comparing index). |
| Filter Exchange · EMA Crossover | |
| xarlor msg #148347 |
7/2/2019 11:27:08 PM No backtester here on SF. Best you can do is hit the back arrow on each filter to see the past performance. Others may offer some backtesting sites or software. |
| Filter Exchange · EMA Crossover | |
| xarlor msg #148337 modified |
7/2/2019 1:45:00 PM |
| Filter Exchange · doji sandwich | |
| xarlor msg #148329 |
7/1/2019 11:42:08 PM My first pass at a doji sandwich. |
| General Discussion · Stan Weinstein's Secrets For Profiting in Bull and Bear Markets | |
| xarlor msg #148311 modified |
6/29/2019 10:13:54 PM I started the book this weekend. I just read chapter 1 and decided to make a filter based on his five points on pages 25-27. Color me impressed. |
| General Discussion · ALL variables must be true | |
| xarlor msg #148227 |
6/22/2019 2:26:21 AM Is this what you're looking for? |
| General Discussion · Need help for this filter. please | |
| xarlor msg #147917 |
5/24/2019 2:17:48 PM @xarlor .... I see where you made the change on this part but. What im trying to formulate is .... the lowest low from either yesterdays close or todays low. And the highest high from either yesterdays close or todays high. Is that what your formula shows but in less steps than mine? from xarlor ....... set{LL, min(low, close 1 day ago)} set{HH, max(high, close 1 day ago)} from me ..... set{LL1,low today} set{LL2,close 1 day ago} set{HH1,high today} set{HH2,high 1 day ago} ----------------------------------------------------- pa427, mine says: Look at today's Low Look at yesterday's Close Give me whichever of the two prices is the lower one Look at today's High look at yesterday's Close Give me whichever of the two prices is the higher one Your original filter said: Look at today's Low Look at today's Close Give me whichever of the two prices is the lower one Look at today's High look at today's Close Give me whichever of the two prices is the higher one As for what you posted here: set{LL1,low today} set{LL2,close 1 day ago} set{HH1,high today} set{HH2,high 1 day ago} Yes, it's essentially the same thing, only you need to then get the low and high: set{LL, min(LL1,LL2)} set{HH, max(HH1,HH2)} |
| General Discussion · Need help for this filter. please | |
| xarlor msg #147873 |
5/22/2019 4:05:33 PM I'm not sure if this is what you were hoping for, but graft is right. For custom EMAs you need the fuction CEMA(indicator,days). I changed 3 instances on your original filter to CEMA and did it for 30 days. Also, your HH and LL was incorrect. You were comparing the high and low to today's close instead of the previous day's close. |
| StockFetcher Forums · · | << 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 >> |