Filter Exchange · Percentage Hughes AD Oscillator with 8 Parameters
|
tomm1111 msg #90764 |
4/4/2010 4:38:26 AM
It certainly is hyperactive as stated in the book. Not sure how this performs since the book was published.
http://books.google.com/books?id=SYWkGQawUgAC&pg=PA74&dq=percent+hughes&cd=2#v=onepage&q=percent%20hughes&f=false
|
Filter Exchange · Percentage Hughes AD Oscillator with 8 Parameters
|
tomm1111 msg #90789 |
4/4/2010 8:17:04 PM
Both are effective, but very different. The EMA is based on price and the Hughes is based on breadth. I think looking at different types of indicator can work together in the analysis.
|
General Discussion · 2-Period RSI trades with ETFs -- Using Options
|
tomm1111 msg #109822 modified |
1/3/2013 12:38:21 AM
If your time frame is short, look at "in the money" weekly or front month options with high delta. If you don't know what "delta" means, don't trade options and read a book to educate yourself (many available that are good). As eman suggests, futures would a good instrument to trade if they fit with your strategy.
|
General Discussion · actual rsi(2) equation
|
tomm1111 msg #66066 |
8/11/2008 1:36:04 PM
Anybody know the actual rsi(2) equation SF uses? Using only 2 bars returns alot of 0's and 100's, however, that is not what a SF rsi(2) filter returns.
The following rsi equation doesn't work.
RSI = 100 - 100 / (1 + RS)
RS = AG / AL
|
General Discussion · actual rsi(2) equation
|
tomm1111 msg #66094 |
8/11/2008 8:33:06 PM
Bump.
Smart guys, SF. What's the actual RSI(2) equation used?
|
General Discussion · actual rsi(2) equation
|
tomm1111 msg #66099 |
8/11/2008 10:52:31 PM
Cool. Thanks Tomb for the reply.
I think I remember running into that equation at some point. I'm going to look into it further.
Tom
|
General Discussion · ADX screen
|
tomm1111 msg #65388 |
7/24/2008 2:35:31 AM
Try this...
First post. Don't know how to set up the fetcher.
show stocks where adx(14) 2 days ago had been decreasing for 5 days
and adx(14) has been increasing for the last 2 days
and adx(14) below -DI(14)
and adx(14) below +DI(14)
and +DI(14) crosses -DI(14) last 2 days
and volume above 100000
and close above 5
|
General Discussion · ADX screen
|
tomm1111 msg #65391 |
7/24/2008 3:12:22 AM
Alright this is the extent of my SF prowness thus far. I couldn't figure out how to use the same filter for buy and sell screens so I modified Infront's filter into 2. Infront, nice filter.
[
/*ADX filter - sell screen*/
show stocks where adx(14) 2 days ago had been decreasing for 5 days
and adx(14) has been increasing for the last 2 days
and adx(14) below -DI(14)
and adx(14) below +DI(14)
and -DI(14) crossed above +DI(14) last 2 days
and volume above 100000
and close above 5
]
[
/*ADX filter - buy screen*/
show stocks where adx(14) 2 days ago had been decreasing for 5 days
and adx(14) has been increasing for the last 2 days
and adx(14) below -DI(14)
and adx(14) below +DI(14)
and -DI(14) crossed below +DI(14) last 2 days
and volume above 100000
and close above 5
|
General Discussion · Amivest Ratio - Coding help for ABSValue and Summation
|
tomm1111 msg #114584 |
7/22/2013 1:47:28 AM
vixvix,
How do you plan using the Amivist Ratio for trading or screening?
|
General Discussion · Any recommendations for "Trading Computers"
|
tomm1111 msg #66260 |
8/16/2008 3:41:12 AM
Guru,
Kudos to you if you found this web site on a 386. Wow. Even reading this is a blast from the past! My first computer was a state of the art 386 back in 1989.
Personally, I wouldn't worry about a "trading" computer. Any modern computer (~$600 max) will do. (Intel or AMD)
My only requirement for a "trading" computer would be a dedicated video card to run 2 monitors. On-mother board video cannot do this very well if at all.
And of course, previously mentioned, a high speed internet connection.
|