| tomm1111 202 posts
 msg #67808
 - Ignore tomm1111
 modified
 | 9/27/2008 12:42:50 AM 
 chetron...only if I can find entry's and exit's like I can assemble filters!  LOL
 
 Check this out.  I removed some stuff from it.  Does this work for basic sub?
 
 Look for extremes on clo, d_5, and rsi(3).  Also, look for spike on the bottom plots.
 
 tomm
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
| chetron 2,817 posts
 msg #67817
 - Ignore chetron
 | 9/27/2008 9:24:43 AM 
 
 no good, tomm.  the restriction is you can't use a custom ma, that uses a custom variable, to create a custom variable, ie: x=cema(var1,3).
 
 
 
 
 | 
| tomm1111 202 posts
 msg #67824
 - Ignore tomm1111
 modified
 | 9/28/2008 12:04:28 AM 
 Some adjustments in the works... I will update filter as necessary.
 
 
 | 
| TheRumpledOne 6,529 posts
 msg #67827
 - Ignore TheRumpledOne
 modified
 | 9/28/2008 10:40:07 AM 
 no good, tomm. the restriction is you can't use a custom ma, that uses a custom variable, to create a custom variable, ie: x=cema(var1,3).
 
 
 +++++++++
 
 ??
 
 xrange and xavgrange  are both custom variables ( I think ).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
| chetron 2,817 posts
 msg #67829
 - Ignore chetron
 modified
 | 9/28/2008 11:25:05 AM 
 BUT TRO, HIGH AND LOW ARE SF VARIABLES. VAR1 IS A CUSTOM VARIABLE.
 
 ***************************
 
 I JUST TRIED TO NAIL IT DOWN AND IT CONTINUES TO ELUDE ME.
 
 WHAT I DO KNOW IS THAT IF YOU TAKE THE MATH OUT OF
 
 
 set{var1,hat2 * 1.5}
 set{x,cema(var1,3)}
 set{s,exp(x)}
 
 AND MAKE IT
 
 
 set{var1,hat2}
 set{x,var1}
 set{s,x}
 
 
 THE RESTRICTIONS ARE OFF.
 
 ALSO MINUS THE "PLOT ON" COMMANDS
 AND MINUS THE DRAW CLO LINE
 
 
 
 
 | 
| tomm1111 202 posts
 msg #67836
 - Ignore tomm1111
 | 9/28/2008 5:26:52 PM 
 FYI - I modified all the filters I posted in this thread.  Results should be very similar.
 
 I did seem to run into a limit somewhere as I cannot do what I first intended with the clo and clo lines (or even screening capabilities. for example "clo crossed below 0.85")
 
 ...works in progress.
 
 tomm
 
 
 |